Maybe your supervisor is just too busy to look at the stuff this week. Don't get discouraged - in the mean time, turn your attention to another section that isn't dependent on the bit you've sent her.

From several accounts, I've had the impression that the time needed to write up a thesis is 'three months, full time writing'. So there you go - you have the perfect amount of time. If you had four months, it would take four months. If you had six, it would take six. That's not a reflection on you - that's a reflection on human nature! :)

Good luck!

I doubt that means they were considering you to be a problem - why would they consider offering you a place if that were the case. Perhaps they were struggling to choose between you and an equally able candidate?

I think it's really really important to have some experience of what the research environment is like before you start out. A dissertation project may give you some insight, but it's not the same as working in a lab day in, day out, for an extended period.

Why do you think you have no chance of entering a scientific job with just a BSc and now work experience? I imagine that's how a lot of research technicians start out. If I were you I would contemplate working as a Research Technician or Research Assistant for a year, and then apply for a PhD. If you're worried about what to put on your application, then emphasise any general skills/experiences you have acquired in other jobs/voluntary work. Just like any other job, communication skills, teamwork and initiative are all things that have value.

Good luck! :)

I think you might be looking at this from the wrong angle. If you complete a PhD, *that* will be scientific work experience which will stand you in good stead for the future. I think the question you should ask yourself is: "Without previous work experience, do I really know what a PhD will be like?"