Overview of pm133

Recent Posts

Frequency of feedback from supervisor
P

Quote From Hanginthere:
Hi everyone,

I have a quick question. How often should one write his/her supervisor a reminder for feedback? Should it be every two weeks or four weeks? I have accepted my fate, in that I have to remind my supervisor to respond to my drafts, at the same time, I don't want to appear like a pain.

Thanks in advance.


Feedback for what?
For a draft paper? A few days with my supervisor but he has been known to take 18 months with other students if they have sent him a poorly drafted piece of work. I would request a meeting by the end of a fortnight if I had not heard and I would assume I had sent him crap. The meeting would be me asking himwhether it was a little crap, a medium sized dollop or whether it was a shitstorm from start to finish in which case I would die of embarassment.
I am too assertive to just passively wait for months on end.

If its for performance reasons, I would not ask him at all.

Is this late interview invitation anything I should be wary of? (Imperial)
P

The timeline is not of importance but lets not be naive about this. Employers absolutely DO interview "ghost candidates" from time to time. The reason for this apparent waste of time is very simple. It allows them to tick a minority quota box or to show evidence that they didnt just hire their friend without at least talking to another candidate.
I am not suggesting that this is what is happening here but it definitely happens.

How to make sure I have any job chances at all after postdoc
P

If you are going to network then avoid doing it indiscriminately or you will waste your time and effort.
Personally I absolutely HATE networking. If you do it with the right people for the right reasons it does work though. Otherwise it becomes transparent and extremely phoney to all around you. If you are good enough at what you do then people will notice you. If you can then hold a conversation, opportunities open up.

What is your idea of a draft paper?
P

Same here. I send him what I consider to be a draft ready to be submitted to the journal. Invariably it needs tweaking or a bit more work but I never send him something I know is not complete.

Publications
P

Quote From excommunicate:
I'm finished my PhD but have no publications yet, however I'm working on three papers, none of which have been accepted by journals yet.

Should I list them on my CV and if so how?

Thanks?


Author list, title of paper and "manuscript submitted" would me my suggestion.

Need ventilating..Clock is ticking towards failure and shame with my PhD
P

Quote From heinasirkka:
Dear forum users,

I'd be very thankful if you share an opinion or a similar experience.

I'm in the 4th year of my PhD in engineering northwest Europe (I'm not European, came here for PhD). I've never expected this to be easy. When I started, I was very motivated and showed a quite good academic records during my Master's (published 5 journals). Since my beginning here, I've been shocked to receive no guidance, and have pressure put on me to build a huge and complex experimental setup from scratch. Two senior PhDs entitled to supervise me just ignored me and officially said that they don't want to help. I thought this is normal because nobody helps no one here and people don't like it when you ask questions. Everybody seemed to be OK with what they are doing, and publishing a lot of papers. I don't even mention the racism. The topics were new to me and I tried so hard to prove myself by reading, working hard non-stop for years. And eventually I could achieve nothing and got probation for a last chance. I finished up some side-project which is very loosely connected to my PhD and save up my a**. But under pressure of building a setup by myself I made some quick faulty engineering decisions for which I'm paying the price for, in my work and private life.

The goddamn machine is not working, I dunno why. I hate it so much. I don't have any interest anymore. I hate this place and horrible people. They are robots. I'm stuck in another country with this commitment surrounded with a feeling of shame and failure. I'm trying to find solutions, asking around. Nobody knows anything about my work and cannot help anymore. Its engineering, there are a lot of details. Hoping for a miracle. I want to burn whole faculty, or run away to Antarctica, or worse. Anyone has similar experience of failure or pre-failure?
Thank you and peace


It is probably not a good idea to be joking about wanting to "burn whole facility".

Feeling intimidated/bullied by my supervisor
P

Quote From Bluesky123:
Hi everyone, can anyone advise, or does anyone have any experience of this?
My supervisor constantly belittles my research, gives me unrealistic deadlines to work to, despite the fact I tell him why these are unrealistic. He reports back to others on my supervisory team letting them know of these deadlines and its stressful to then have to engage in these conversations explaining my case for why this is unrealistic when I've already told him. I've worked as a lecturer in HE and I also work in the field which my research is in and so I have good time management and organisational skills and I'm more than capable of completing work when needed, but Im being pressured into rushing work to meet his demands. He appears to have quite an aggressive nature, and ideas I have for my research are often dismissed. I have tried to talk to him about how we are working together and have told him I'm not happy with the way he speaks to me and have asked if we can look at a better way of communicating, but this didn't go well. Since, he has been more difficult to work with and after asking to see his correspondence with others regarding my research (which was possible through a specific university procedure) I have realised that he has been providing inaccurate and dishonest reports about my work and my communication with him. He used Facebook to share his anger about a specific issue, and although I wasn't named, it was clearly about me (that's not me jumping to conclusions...) I was told by colleagues about the Facebook thread that followed his comments. I feel like Im going mad, trying to manage a PhD is hard enough. Im doubting my abilities which is unusual for me, and I feel like my confidence is at an all time low. I have tried to find a new supervisor but no luck yet and this may not be possible. Can anyone advise/support/help me see a clear way through?!


This is totally unacceptable. Academia lives in its own world with staff thinking they can simply abuse their students and this does look like a case of abuse.
If you have evidence then consider a formal complaint and request a new supervisor.
You tried talking to him and it made it worse so its time to either press the nuclear button
or risk not graduating at all.

How to deal with day to day failures during a PhD?
P

You might be right but the thing is everyone deals with these things differently. I have had lots of pressure in other aspects of my private life (including finances and long distance marriage) that have added to my feelings of insecurity and overthinking. But precisely because I know that if these small details affect me so much - I will lose it for the bigger ones, I am trying to start early and try to find a way to deal with them better. So yes, I am trying and I am sure I will manage to find a way to develop some resilience. Thanks for your honesty though. It always helps![/quote]

In my personal experience, losing it over trivial things is a sign of underlying stress. Humans can only carry so much of this. The things which tip you over the edge may be a symptom of those other stresses. You mention a couple of these things in your response above. I dont know if you can find ways to alleviate some of the bigger stresses but if you can, you might find yourself a lot calmer over your PhD issues. This might work better for you.
Good luck.

How to deal with day to day failures during a PhD?
P

Quote From skyisnotthelimit:
Quote From pm133:
It sounds like both you and your supervisor are taking this way too seriously. It's only a conference. A mistake was made. Get over it. No need for embarassment, lengthy apologies, beating yourselves up or pledges to "do better next time".

If this type of utterly trivial incident affects you this much you risk having serious issues when a genuine problem occurs.
Relax bud. Mistakes happen.


@pm133, I am sure you're right but I guess the beginning is the hardest since I still have not figured my way around things and people. But I should definitely learn to take these things easier otherwise I will go nuts by the end of the PhD. You're right. That's why this forum is so helpful.


It's more serious than simply going nuts.
If you are getting yourself into this state over completely trivial things like this in only your first year and don't immediately do something about it then the PhD will break you.
You need to learn really quickly how to develop some resilience because it reads to me that under the slightest pressure you are caving emotionally.
Good luck.

How to deal with day to day failures during a PhD?
P

Quote From skyisnotthelimit:
So, I am a first year PhD student and I am far from perfect or knowing it all. I am just figuring things along the way. Anyway, I am working hard in order to improve and learn things of course. But, sometimes that's not enough right? So I happened to make a slip and apply for a small grant (for attending a conference) without being eligible for it. My supervisor told me today that he felt embarrassed that we applied for it without being eligible. The ineligibility consisted on a detail. Nevertheless I had my doubts when I saw the eligibility criteria but still didn't say anything to my supervisor.

Now, I can try and complain about it and find a million reasons why "it was not my fault" but the truth is I made a mistake. I failed. And I have to admit it and learn from it. So I told my supervisor that he's right and that I only made that mistake because my approach during these 6 months of PhD has been very much reactive rather than initiating things. And that's wrong. I told him that because I was trying not to bother him and please him by mostly saying YES, I forgot what was important - MY STANCE ON THINGS. So I apologized and reassured him that my approach will be much different from now on. He admitted that it was not only my fault but that he being a member of the board granting this grant should have known that I am not eligible and should have told me.

So I guess my question is - have you had these kinds of failures and if yes how do you deal with them? I will admit that it doesn't feel good to know that you've screwed up on your first year of the PhD but on the other hand I feel good knowing that eventhough I feel like shit, I am trying to learn from my mistakes and I know I will work hard on this regard.


It sounds like both you and your supervisor are taking this way too seriously. It's only a conference. A mistake was made. Get over it. No need for embarassment, lengthy apologies, beating yourselves up or pledges to "do better next time".

If this type of utterly trivial incident affects you this much you risk having serious issues when a genuine problem occurs.
Relax bud. Mistakes happen.

Jobless after a PhD
P

I am going to disagree with the above two posters.
I think there is every advantage in contacting professors speculatively but understand they are probably not sitting with money. You can ask them if they are interested in a preparing a funding request with you as the named postdoc. I have seen that work with colleagues of mine.
Also there is nothing wrong in appyling for biomedical jobs. The fact that you are being shortlisted tells you that your CV is fine. You are not being selected because you are probably up against people with better experience. You need luck and that comes from continuing to apply wherever you feel you are interested in that job. Again I have personally watched several colleagues succeed in this regard over the years, gaining science and engineering jobs they had zero experience for and have personally managed it myself.

Good luck and dont give up.

How to answer "Why this institution?" when you "don't care" about the institution
P

Quote From TamaDP:
Hi, everyone!

I have just received the invitation to chat with a PhD project supervisor. I am guessing that this is an informal interview (he mentions the chance to talk about my background and interests, skype with the other supervisor and current PhD students) and so I have started going through the list of possible questions that I may be asked.

This is a project that really interests me for the subject itself, and because one of the supervisors has several publications of impact in the area, and I haven't paid much attention to the Uni where it is held... So should I be honest and say it's not because of the institution but project+supervisor? Or should I "fake" my answer?


A better idea might be to do some research on the university such as resources they have which you feel will help you, location etc.
You should be very careful about faking anything. Us older folks are very good at sniffing out fakery. Very good indeed. Some of us are evil enough to deliberately ask questions like this just to test for this. Lets be honest if you are going to fake an inteview can you be trusted not to fake data when push comes to shove?

Phd research fellowship application
P

Agree with ToL although my experience is with industrial jobs.
If a company interviews you and you are a stand-out candidate they will not waste time offering you the job. There are always exceptions and I was once offered a job three weeks after interviewing. Clearly in that case I can assume they offered it to someone else first. In the main though, I expect to hear straight away. If I don't I assume the worst and move on.
Certainly you should not put off other jobs in the meantime.
What you could do if you have another offer is to phone the person you do want to work for and let them know that they are your first choice and essentially find a nice way of giving them 24 hours to decide. I've done that before as well and found this to be a successful strategy.

Prof's response on Postdoc in Germany
P

So you have not been interviewed then by the sounds of it. In that case I dont see this as a job offer but something is very strange here. For a start, I dont know what a "postdoc scholarship" is.
I would have thought a scholarship was for students. Postdocs are not students.
Secondly I not aware of anyone who hires someone without conducting an interview.
I just wonder if something is being lost in translation.

Finding a PhD with a specific interest already in mind.
P

Quote From TreeofLife:
Definitely. It's really hard to come up with ideas. It's also frustrating when you finally think of things to do but have no funding and then someone else beats you to it!


I find it helpful to be free of stress when I am thinking of ideas. I also found it doesnt help to rush the process either. Both stressing and rushing caused me lots of problems. Not easy when bils need paid though.