Signup date: 05 Oct 2009 at 3:36pm
Last login: 09 Jul 2010 at 12:42pm
Post count: 608
wooohoooo... I started at 22.5 and have near enough brown hair... only I'm aquarius. Hmmm.
I also agree with PhDBug about 20 somethings definitely having the maturity to conduct good interviews, etc. I never had any problems when doing mine, and have been called on to do several consultation projects, including ones for government depratments, and I'm a 20 something. I think it's an individual thing. You can't generalise on this one.
Hi,
I'm 24 and submitting in the next few months. My supervisor is about 15 years older than me. There are no power differentials and he's extremely impartial. He encourages me to speak up about my work and other aspects of my career (teaching etc), and never asserts his own opinion over mine.
I feel extremely lucky and proud to be doing my PhD so young. I've learned a lot over the last 3 years and am glad I've had this opportunity to grow before my career has properly begun.
======= Date Modified 19 Nov 2009 15:56:48 =======
Ahhh... but sneaks... we will be the "proper doctors". I have a number of friends who are medical doctors who admit to me freely that they wish they had the "ability" to do a PhD. Medical degrees are afterall long versions of bachelors degrees, with the added benefit of being able to call yourself a doctor. Medical doctors still have to do masters degrees, research, etc to get to the top of their game.
When did this discussion become a debate about IQ??
IQ and intelligence are two very seprarate things, often confused to be the same. I agree with MissSpacey. Intelligence refers to creativity, reasoning, common sense, emotional understanding, natural or learned ability. IQ tests do not test for these types of intelligence. They examine numeriacal, spacial and verbal reasoning, but those factors in themselves do not denote intelligence.
I'm of the belief that everyone is intelligent if you give people credit for the things that they are good at. A dancer may well not know how to write an academic article, but who am I to criticise when she/he can move more gracefully than I could if I tried. An artist can create beauty with their hands, but may not be able to solve the simplest of problems. Are we to say Picasso wasn't intelligent?
Intelligence has nothing to do with IQ. IQ is the scapegoat for people who can't recognise their own, or other peoples natural talents.
I'd also like to point out that IQ tests are in no way valid. It would be quite easy, if one wanted, to "revise" the types of questions in an IQ test and learn the ways in which to answer. They're also culturally unreliable.
PostgraduateForum Is a trading name of FindAUniversity Ltd
FindAUniversity Ltd, 77 Sidney St, Sheffield, S1 4RG, UK. Tel +44 (0) 114 268 4940 Fax: +44 (0) 114 268 5766
An active and supportive community.
Support and advice from your peers.
Your postgraduate questions answered.
Use your experience to help others.
Enter your email address below to get started with your forum account
Enter your username below to login to your account
An email has been sent to your email account along with instructions on how to reset your password. If you do not recieve your email, or have any futher problems accessing your account, then please contact our customer support.
or continue as guest
To ensure all features on our website work properly, your computer, tablet or mobile needs to accept cookies. Our cookies don’t store your personal information, but provide us with anonymous information about use of the website and help us recognise you so we can offer you services more relevant to you. For more information please read our privacy policy
Agree Agree