Hi all, 

I need advice guys. I was allocated an external Supervisor (A) who is not an academic- by this I mean not teaching or supervising students anywhere. No strong publication record, less than 3 papers, and these were done over 7 years ago. Supervisor seems to have connections in the department. On our initial meeting I raised issues to do with my research that I wanted to achieve. Seeing I might struggle under such supervision, I raised this with department and was allocated a now very competent person (B) as part of the team. 

Now having submitted my RP to both, A's approach is akward, having had 2-3 meetings already, focus tends to be on outline, references etc. But this is just a concept note which needs guidance on strategic direction? 

From B's feedback, I feel my concept note has been fully read. Commented on key methodological issues, and offered more insights into other options etc. B is an accomplished Professor, widely published, understands methodology/how study should evolve etc. 

Now A came first and am sure based on contract, wants assumes lead, which I think, wrong person on good research. 

I have discussed with B the possibility of taking the lead, no obvious reservations of taking the lead. So I need advice, should I discuss this with A and share my concerns and let B lead. 

If I remain quiet now it might ruin my work at critical phases of the work. 

Please advice me beloved and best approach!

Please don't make multiple posts of the same thing.