Overview of Tudor_Queen

Recent Posts

What would you do with an extra year before grad school?
T

I would apply for funding (or a program or whatever it is called in your neck of the woods), and then once secured I would chill. I think that would be the more productive thing you could do - as it would be great preparation for the grueling 3 years ahead.

Has this ever been done to get a PhD before?
T

Ps. Re 80% not being impossible. You know your own abilities. If you apply yourself more than previously you should be able to achieve greater things! Even if you don't get the result you want, if you really commit to it then might manage to increase your overall average, and every little helps.
All the best.
Tudor

Has this ever been done to get a PhD before?
T

Hey! I had "the grades" but found it difficult to get PhD funding (I sucked in my first interview and had to wait another year for my next applications - it was stressful as I thought "how many years am I going to have to do this for?!"). Thankfully it was only a year in the end but still - it was hard.

I would say in your position just do the best you can and see what happens. Enthusiasm counts if you get through to interview stage. I'd say apply for as many as possible (within reason - after all - each one will involve some work) to increase your chances of getting funding. I wouldn't resign myself if I were you, but definitely go for it.

Also - maybe consider Plan B options. A colleague of mine got a 2.1 or a 2.2 (can't remember now but think it was a 2.2), funded herself for the first year of her PhD, and then managed to obtain funding for the remaining two years. That could be a Plan B for if things don't work out the first time round. Also maybe apply for a mixture of different unis.

Good luck with everything!

Why did you leave/are considering leaving academia?
T

Quote From pm133:

It would absolutely be a mistake to consider hard sciences and technology as reliable. Both worlds are crammed full of people doing utterly useless research with no credible pretence at even aiming at practical usage. Here is a very simple and obvious example. If academic science is so convinced of its worth, why does it insist on producing indecipherable papers written in deliberately archaic language and locking them away behind pay walls? Who are they writing these articles for? It certainly isn't the general public who are paying for all this nonsense.

The first sentence of your second paragraph is the core of the pack of lies which academic science spouts in order to justify its existence and secure funding. Almost nobody is involved in uncovering "truths" or producing any benefits whatsoever to society.

I understand that we need people doing genuinely out of the box stuff but right now, in the depths of our economic problems, academic science has a duty in my opinion to step up and start using scarce public money to start producing more useful outputs that could realistically help society. In short, science needs to get its finger out and start doing something to justify its vast budget.


Haha! So other people think this too! I sometimes think that academia is a classic case of the emporor having no clothes on!

Having said that though, I also do acknowledge that the pursuit of science has achieved many excellent things as well. And going back to the original post on this thread - maybe for some of us, the good outweighs the bad, and so we will choose to stay in academia.

I am undecided at present. I enjoy what I do right now and would have to find something else I enjoyed equally well or more before I seriously considered leaving. However, if my motivation was money or prestige or something else, I would most certainly have left academia by now.

Why did you leave/are considering leaving academia?
T

Quote From Pjlu:
[quote] I would like to think-I hope- that most of us, more of us have these same values and ideals behind our work. I guess that is why it cuts so deeply when we learn about plagiarism, falsified results, and finally understand that luck and playing the political games can sometimes (not always) be behind success in academia-more so than merit on occasions.


Yes, I agree - I think it is a shock to many people. I remember being pretty disheartened the first time I heard of a scandal of this sort in academia. The thing is though - I guess those in the church and other such large organisations (but particularly "the church" - sorry I am not anti religious - it is just an example) would also say that they of all people have good morals and real values when they enter their institutions. And we all know what sorts of things have gone on in such institutions - the very opposite to what is good and caring in many cases - and on a large scale, known by many, and not reported or known (until recently).

I wonder if academia isn't headed the same way... not child sex abuse scandals but falsification of results and the other things you mentioned above (sorry if anyone finds this comparison offensive - I am comparing institutions and their dark secrets rather than the actual scandals/atrocities or their effects).

OK, so maybe in academia terribly dodgy things are happening here and there rather than being the norm - but who knows? Who is accountable and to whom? No one and no one!

Sorry to be depressing!

Why did you leave/are considering leaving academia?
T

Quote From pm133:
Academia is in an appalling state and needs urgently dragged into the 21st century. I am so angry about this I am tempted to start lobbying politicians about it to publicise what goes on.



This is really thought provoking. Isn't it interesting how when mentioned on the radio or on TV academia and research are sort of spoken about with a sense or awe and as though they have some sort of purity or morality about them? Sort of like "the church" once was. It would be really good if the realities and fallabilities were exposed.

Under pressure! Need some encouragement
T

Keep your chin up dotdottung - it will soon be submitted and no more revisions to be made to it. Look at it this way - probably your supervisor's feedback has enabled you to improve the quality of the proposal, and next time you come to write something, you will be able to preempt some of the kinds of comments he/she is going to make.

Take a break. Seriously! Sleeping and eating is far more important than what your supervisor wants. When you're rested and refreshed, you can look on your PhD with fresh eyes. You might find that it is rewarding once you get the feedback from the external examiners, and this may encourage you to continue.

I can't relate entirely, as my supervisors aren't demanding (I wish they were a bit actually). But I can relate to a difficult first year experience. I was unhappy for most of my first year. Second year was better. I'm beginning the third year now and really enjoying myself. So my advice - prioritise your health, don't neglect other parts of your life (eg. hobbies, friendships), and persevere. It'll get better. A phrase that helped me throughout my first year when having to submit continuation reports and such like was "I can only do what I can do". : )

Masters dissertation query
T

Absolutely - this is really tricky as I've sent my work over before when it was still in an early phase and it was a nightmare to then improve it independently at the same time as trying to address their comments (you feel that you can't change what you now think is crap because they've already seen it and may not have raised it as an issue).

So I would suggest definitely send it over only when it is ready to be sent over (ie. when you've exhausted all your own knowledge and ability!). Get it done as quickly as possible and send it to them as if it is the final piece of work that you are submitting. Then the feedback you receive will be most useful.

If you worry that timing will be a problem, then it is perfectly acceptable to ask them how long they would like to have it for so that you can factor in time to address their comments before submission. They'll probably appreciate agreeing on a proper timeline as given their already busy schedule. Mine usually has it for 2 weeks give a day or two.

In a nutshell, my advice (from a horrible previous experience!) definitely go for later rather than sooner if you want the most useful feedback. Unless of course you are stuck now and could really do with the input to get you going. Also try to agree on a date to send it and a date to expect it back so that it fits in with your deadline.

Good luck!

How do you keep notes on your PhD learning?
T

Hi everyone -

Thank you! You all seem to be saying something similar here, which allays my fears somewhat! I do look forward to when I am focusing more on writing and less on the data collection. But the writing part will come later.

Thanks as always everyone. Love this forum!

How do you keep notes on your PhD learning?
T

I really struggle with acquiring and retaining information and knowledge (eg. findings of studies, overview of the field, and other vitally important stuff) on my PhD. I am about to enter my final year and can't believe how scatty my notes are and how disorganised and uncertain the knowledge feels in my head... compared to at undergrad when everything was so neatly written up and organised - ready to revise from. I still know what I learnt back then, whereas my learning over the past 2 years just feels so messy and incomplete. I think I must be doing something wrong.

Does anyone who has experience of doing their PhD have any tips or advice? Do you use cue cards, write extensive notes and organise them very carefully? I feel embarrassed saying this as I was a really organised learner before. Now it seems to have fallen apart (I think stemming from the lack of structure) and I really need to change things NOW. I don't think my supervisors are aware of how rubbish I've been, as I still produce good work (eg. run my studies, analyse the data properly). It is just when I come to write up things could get very challenging. Please help!

Changing University after Starting a PhD?
T

Quote From ema123:
I'm finding it difficult to really get into my current PhD and I think its only some emotional attachment keeping me where I am and not wanting to let down my supervisors. The new PhD is in an area I am passionate about and if I had the two to compare initially it would have been an easy choice to go with this second option. I just feel bad about potentially leaving where I am though.


It will (probably) only get worse if you stay where you are when there was an opportunity to go elsewhere and be more fulfilled. It sounds ruthless to leave perhaps, but it really isn't. The more I see of academia, the more I see that those above have little regard for those below when there is nothing in it for themselves (generally...). And so you need to do what is good for you. Your supervisors will get over it after a very short time and find someone else (funding is recyclable if you leave early on). I don't think you would have any regrets about leaving after doing the awkward bit of telling them.

But yes, as Pjlu says... definitely secure the other position before you leave this one or even mention possibly leaving.

Good luck!

Books about publishing
T

Congratulations timefortea! And glad you enjoyed your graduation ceremony!

Personally I think the best thing to do is look at articles published in the journals you are considering publishing in, and copy their style.

Changing University after Starting a PhD?
T

A friend of mine has just done this (been awarded funding elsewhere and so switched to a different institution) and has no regrets. She said it was a bit awkward telling the old supervisors that she was leaving. Other than that - she is really excited about starting her new project.

PhD completion
T

Do you want to finish it?

Desire is the key to motivation (Mario Andretti)

Maybe you need to spend some time reflecting and reminding yourself of what you really want... and then what you need to do, in concrete and measurable terms, to achieve it.

What would you do?
T

Better the devil you know? But then again, could be an opportunity...