I am doing my Ph.D. in Australia and so you have two examiners. I sent my thesis for examination last year and got it back with one supervisor saying it was a pass but one said R+R and the adjudicator agreed on the R+R. This was based on some statistics that the examiner didn't quite understand. My supervisor convinced me that I was right and that I should make it slightly clearer and send it out again. I got it back the second time (from the same supervisors) with one saying pass and the other failing it. Now I have to send it out to an adjudicator again and I am worried they will side with the examiner that failed me again. Any advice?