Overview of Keep_Calm

Recent Posts

writing: nature or nurture?
K

Interesting. From my personal experience, I spent a long time feeling like my undergraduate dissertation was the best thing I had written so far in terms of style. I was trying so hard with PhD stuff that it all felt very stilted and I couldn't get the sense across that I was actually excited about anything I was saying. Eventually, I have started to feel like my writing has progressed and is better than UG. Maybe it's because I'm more comfortable with my subject, maybe because I've focused so hard on writing techniques and it's eventually started to seem natural? I suppose what I'm trying to say is that I think a 'natural' style of writing needs to be nurtured. Not that I'm saying I'm there yet, by any stretch of the imagination :-)

Entering my 3rd year...
K

Me too Emmanki, scary how fast time flies, isn't it?

Hold on tight, it's going to be a bumpy ride...

PGF Drinks/Dinner up North...
K

I can make it to Manchester fairly easily and would love to come but this month is very busy for me- I'll have to see what dates etc. :-)

Excellent People
K

Do you get jealous of them?

I've recently been introduced to a girl I'm going to a conference with in September. She is doing a PhD at a very prestigious university and is incredibly beautiful. She's also lovely, and modest. I know these are far from the only things which make somebody an excellent person and I’m not sure good looks should even really count, but anywho...
When meeting people like that do you just think ‘well, mustn’t grumble, I’ve got all my own teeth and hair etc’? I seem to have recast her as some kind of goddess in my own mind. Maybe I’m in love :-x

Best book on PhD study
K

How to write your PhD in 15 minutes a day by Jean Bolker. Invaluable.

Handling those who dont understand
K

I hate to say it, but you will probably encounter this kind of attitude a lot during your PhD, whether you’re a mother or not. PhD’s are massively misunderstood and undervalued in this country, currently. How to change people’s attitudes- Who knows? Maybe there’s a PhD topic in there ; )
As an anecdotal aside, last night I watched Mastermind and then University Challenge with my flatmate. He is incapable of watching UC without making some disparaging comments about how the team members must have no life and no friends and what’s the point in knowing all this ‘useless’ stuff. Yet he is enthralled by the Mastermind contestants and thinks they’re great. He admitted that he is probably biased against the UC contestants purely because they’re students whereas the Mastermind contestants usually have ‘proper jobs’. At one point I would have been fuming...For better or worse, I don’t really care now. I enjoy what I do and I hope to contribute to a body of knowledge and teach my students some interesting things. Aside from that, you can’t please everyone

Dating advice
K

Honest, self-deprecating and likes a drink...you sound great to me Maria! :-)

Word of the day
K

Quote From Natassia:

Pervasive is one of my favourites, I'm trying to fine tune my grammar at the moment so learning how to use 'whilst' as apparantly that's better than some alternatives. Also I've been told to use 'this' less.


I once got an article back from a journal objecting to me using the word 'whilst' and asking, bizarrely, if I'd been 'influenced by my reading material in my choice of vocabulary' (I study late medieval literature) *scratches head*. So I've not been using 'whilst' as a result. Who knows what's right?!

Writing Styles
K

I’m not sure I have a consistent style, but from first draft to ‘’finished’’ would probably look something like:
1. Re-read primary materials (literature) and read as many secondary sources as possible in the time I’ve given myself making lots of notes as I go along, no matter how inconsequential and random they seem at the time.
2. Stop and read through everything written during 1), work out what the different parts of my argument are even if they don’t all fit together yet
3. Organize into some sort of logical shape and add in references.
4. Send to sup with lots of notes like ‘need to expand upon this’ and ‘waiting for this book to turn up’ : D
5. See what he comes up with. Look up all the extra references he inevitably suggests and start trying to integrate them, work on any style issues he’s highlighted.
6. Send it back. At this point there’ll either be a major flaw in my argument which needs hammering out over a period of time or I can stop and just focus on wording/style.
7. Check references and it’s good to go.

All in all, a long and messy process!

A bit disheartened....
K

I love Teek's idea for a title! I think that could really work.

A bit disheartened....
K

It really makes me angry when reviewers make such unhelpful- and frankly unprofessional- comments. It’s one thing to say ‘have you considered that this area is already well researched’ and another to say that it’s ‘new wine in an old bottle’. Sadly, it happens though. Take my little story as encouragement- I was rejected from a very minor journal with some comments which knocked me for six, but I took them on board, re-submitted to a much better one and it’s now getting published : ) Give yourself a little bit of time to regroup and then go to the conference and knock their socks off. Use this opportunity to explain to people exactly why new research is needed in this field. Thinking about it, what’s wrong with new wine in an old bottle anyway?!

Can't think straight :-(
K

Oh, EV, I’ve been there so many times. In fact I’m struggling with a similar thing right now. I know how hard it is when you’re desperately trying to piece things together to make an argument. I agree with Sim’s ideas, changing location can really help sometimes, as well as switching from working on a pc to pen and paper or vice versa. Can you incorporate the difficulties you’ve been having into your paper somehow? What I mean is, instead of trying to create a completely integrated paper in the next 2 weeks could you present it as a series of observations and talk about some of the benefits and difficulties of the research you’re undertaking? Some of the best papers I’ve heard have been like this as audiences can really engage with them and you might get some genuinely useful feedback.
Either way, definitely take some pressure of yourself and don’t think of it as trying to write the world’s best conference paper.

Please tell me it will pass...
K

I just wanted to add my thoughts to those below as you are such a lovely, supportive poster and have helped me many times in the past. I imagine you have already tried this but have you thought about some meditation? I've watched a couple of Youtube videos about mindfulness and it's a nice way of saying 'it's ok that I'm feeling like this, it doesn't make me an incapable person.' And you will certainly, certainly get through this, but try not to think about the future for now and just concentrate on enjoying your week. Best of luck x

Being a smartarse
K

======= Date Modified 26 Jun 2010 08:10:46 =======
======= Date Modified 26 Jun 2010 08:09:06 =======

Quote From Slizor:


Thirdly, on the whole issue of offense, I think its worth echoing what earlier posters said in that offense is something that is fundamentally taken by the other person. Sure, I can try to give offense, but it doesn't exist until someone else perceives it. And it turns out that people choose to take offense at some very random things. For example, some nationalistic Greeks are offended if you call Macedonia Macedonia. If you take things like that into account in a pre-emptory effort not to offend people than you'll never have conversation or make anything resembling a joke. It would be a dull world if conversation was restricted to only what the most pious feel they can discuss.



Hi Slizor,

I would have a few issues with this. There's a middle ground between making whatever comment you (generic) like to somebody else even if it is grossly insensitive and never having a conversation again. I'm not saying you were grossly insensitive in this case, just following on your hypothetical situation. A lot of people tend to get up in arms about 'political correctness' these days but political correctness was born out of the completely admirable sense that people should respect each other and their cultural or physical differences. That doesn't mean never having a conversation again but saying 'sorry, have I offended you? Can I ask why you find that offensive?'
I also wonder how different this thread would be if the language used wasn't casually sexist but casually racist or homophobic...

Edit: Basically, what Eska said :-)

Being a smartarse
K

Quote From Sue2604:


Firstly, second wave feminism has always been concerned with language and words - this is not a product of post-modernism/post-structuralism. It was 70s feminists who started the push for the use of non-gendered, non-sexist language. 70s feminists fought for equality on many fronts - in language, in philosophy, in academia, as well as for concrete gains such in education, employment, safety for women etc. A focus on words is not new. The 

Secondly, If it wasn't for 'navel gazing' feminists, how would we expect new ideas to emerge? Should feminists only be fighting for material gains for women? I think not. As Audre Lord said (who, btw, was an African American 1970s feminist), 'the master's tools will never dismantle the master's house' ie we need new frames of reference. Post-structuralism can provide this. Why shouldn't feminists study post-structuralism? Feminist activity is needed in every arena, not just the material ones. There are feminists everywhere, who work everyday, to make women's lives better. Many of these work within a feminist frame of reference, which may or may not stem from a post-modern basis, and loads of women do focus on making a practical difference to women's lives.

Thirdly, lots of leading feminist post-structuralists have used post-structuralism to theorise around difference, stemming in part, from their position as women from an ethnic minority background. Post-structuralism is definitely not confined to white feminists.



An excellent post Sue.