Overview of Duncanwilliam

Overview

Avatar placeholder
Duncanwilliam
Wednesday, 29 May 2019 at 11:53am
Saturday, 23 May 2020 at 10:19pm
3
Login to send a private message to Duncanwilliam
page 1 of 1 recent posts

Thread: Can published peer reviewed articles of sections of research be used as validation?

posted
24-May-20, 22:45
Avatar for Duncanwilliam
posted about 1 week ago
Thanks for the replies.

I developed the pilot framework at a masters level, of which two peer reviewed conference papers were presented and published and one article. I am now upgrading to phd and busy improving and expanding this framework where by I am planning 2 articles for two core aspects of the framework. Essentially I want to use the article published about the pilot framework as proof of concept and the two articles I am planning as validation of the final framework.

Thread: Can published peer reviewed articles of sections of research be used as validation?

posted
23-May-20, 22:21
edited about 5 seconds later
Avatar for Duncanwilliam
posted about 1 week ago
I am currently developing a framework that has various facets. I have published a paper on the pilot study of this framework, and plan to publish papers for each of the facets that make up the framework. Can these be used as validation for my PhD?

Thread: Is validation by conducting expert questionnaires a valid PhD framework validation method?

posted
08-May-20, 18:29
edited about 6 seconds later
Avatar for Duncanwilliam
posted about 3 weeks ago
Hi all,

I am developing a framework to propose a solution for a complex multiphaceted challenge in the aerospace manufacturing industry. The framework is developed based on industry standards, technical reports, regulations, expert interviews and observation at local companies.

As the framework covers a wide range of manuracturing systems/processes that are typically spread amongst a large supply chain, a case study/implementation approach to validation isnt feasible (and cost). Is presenting the developed framework to industry experts and receiving their feedback a valid for of validation for PhD level? if so, what should I keep note of and look out for (specific to what examiners typically woiuld not approve of)?

Lastly, are there other ways of validation such a framework?

Many thanks
Duncan
page 1 of 1 recent posts

Postgraduate
Forum

Copyright ©2018
All rights reserved

Postgraduate Forum

Masters Degrees

PhD Opportunities

PostgraduateForum is a trading name of FindAUniversity Ltd
FindAUniversity Ltd, 77 Sidney St, Sheffield, S1 4RG, UK. Tel +44 (0) 114 268 4940 Fax: +44 (0) 114 268 5766