Signup date: 17 Oct 2017 at 4:13pm
Last login: 21 Jan 2021 at 6:46pm
Post count: 113
Yes. Use Latex!
I know it's a bit of a longshot, but I'm after "Fly Fishing", it's by J. R. Hartley.
Sorry to hear about your ordeal. Rewt's advice is good, but more specifically you could ask them to explicitly say that you "received funding starting on date x, which ceased on date y", that way it is clearly stating you have no source of income or loan, which may have more effect in terms of convincing them you need the financial support. Good luck.
Hi rewt,
Yes, my previous Ph.D. supervisor also used to do that for papers we worked on.
I found, this, which essentially recommends the same, and a few other points:
https://imechanica.org/node/14942
Wizard
Happy New Year everyone!
I am to submit another manuscript shortly and felt it would be good to get ideas on what is a good strategy when picking reviewers to put forward for submission of a paper.
I have experienced that reviewers can expedite or hamper the submission process. More often than not, submission can be impeded by reviewers who haven't properly read the paper, don't have the relevant knowledge (though they should according to their profile), or are just difficult for the sake of it hence I think it would be a good thread for myself and others.
Would be good to hear your thoughts and experiences.
Cheers
Sorry to hear you feel that way. Another person might view the Clinical Research Assistant role a good position, whilst you potentially view it as a failure, so I think despite having challenges in the pursuit of a PhD, there is some faulty thinking at play here (we all have this to a degree).
I think the following book will help you. Particularly, the section on External vs Internal centred values.
https://web.csulb.edu/~tstevens/
or PDF version:
https://web.csulb.edu/~tstevens/ChooseToBeHappy.pdf
Wishing you all the best,
Jamie
Good luck! Fingers crossed.
Is there one for the post-doc game?
If you are really set on getting a PhD, you could first do an M.Res (Masters by research). That way you'll have 1 (sometimes 2) research projects to demonstrate your research abilities. Do these well and you shouldn't have trouble applying after you've completed it.
Rewt is right, it can be a lot of work --- the peer view process can also take time. I would suggest submitting a poster representing your work to a good conference, but with COVID there's lots of disruption, some may still go ahead online.
:-P
I'm surprised nobody got my joke "isn't even justified", or perhaps it wasn't that funny, lol.
PostgraduateForum Is a trading name of FindAUniversity Ltd
FindAUniversity Ltd, 77 Sidney St, Sheffield, S1 4RG, UK. Tel +44 (0) 114 268 4940 Fax: +44 (0) 114 268 5766
An active and supportive community.
Support and advice from your peers.
Your postgraduate questions answered.
Use your experience to help others.
Enter your email address below to get started with your forum account
Enter your username below to login to your account
An email has been sent to your email account along with instructions on how to reset your password. If you do not recieve your email, or have any futher problems accessing your account, then please contact our customer support.
or continue as guest