Overview of pm133

Recent Posts

unconscious bias in academia
P

Academic work should always be marked with the names sealed off where possible to prevent this type of thing.
It is more difficult to be biased in STEM subjects because the student either knows how to do something or they dont. In that context, bias will have a marginal effect. I imagine in the humanities, bias could be disastrous.

In the wider world, bias is actively encouraged and can be a good thing. We are all encouraged to network for example. People buy from people they know. Who you know can matter much more than what you know. I have been on both sides of that.
Of course we can debate about the fairness of that but the cold hard reality is that life is not, has not and never will be built on fairness. Being the "best person for the job" doesn't really make sense for the vast majority of jobs if you think about it.

Anyway, I am waffling. For grading at university, bias has no place and there are easy ways to prevent it.

14 Significance of Water
P

Quote From Gloriawoods:
we


Perhaps a couple of hours after drinking the water ;-D

Making a complaint
P

Quote From helebon:
I intermitted and returned to the master's course. Then I was not added to the online resources for two months, the admin person has taken responsibility for this (in an email). I have a trail on a social media group page which shows students had a similar problem and other problems with the course.


I am not sure what your first sentence means.
As for the rest, well at least you have some mitigation and some evidence of a systematic issue.
The next question would be regarding the two month delay in listing you on the online resources page. That is a very long time. What did you do to chase that up? Did you personally approach or email the course leader requesting details of submissions etc. in the absence of access to the online resources?

Advice on triple majoring.
P

Quote From Jackhall197:
Hi all.

I know this is mainly for postgrads, but I really need some advice.
I'm deciding whether or not to do a triple major in psychology, neuroscience and computer science.

I've always wanted to be a neuroscientist and psychologist so my plans were always to do two masters.
I would've graduated this year, after 3 years, with a major in psychology and neuroscience. And my plans were to Finnish my second masters when I was 27.
Now with the computer science major included it will take me 5 years to get the same degree, but with a triple major. This means I will only be finishing my second masters when I'm 29.

My plans are still the same in the way that I want to be a neuroscientist and psychologist.
The computer science will only be for myself as I've always wanted to be able to code and think it will benefit my career in the future.

I'm just scared that giving up extra two years to do this is not the way to go.

Any advice will be greatly appreciated.


You don't need to spend two years learning how to program computers. Teach yourself in your spare time. If you have some ability you should be able to do this in two or three month. Get a decent book for the language you want to learn.
A safer bet would be to check the job or PhD job specs for the areas you are interested in and let that guide your choice.

The clash of supervisors
P

Quote From Zd_Nomad:
Hi all,

This is my first post and I come to seek advice on how I should approach my main supervisor about the infinite changes being made on my research, every time I have a meeting with both of my supervisors together.

I'm about to submit my first year's report to be upgraded to PhD status, and I still haven't managed to identify my research grounds, as I keep jumping from one area to another due to the advises I get from both supervisors. I want to know how can I approach my main supervisor and let himknow that I need to stick with one area that I can search in depth instead of touching the surface of multiple areas.

I'd like to mention that my second supervisor is great with the advises they provide, it's just that he started his supervision at the end of my first year, so they aren't fully aware of my research direction. And I honestly don't like the approach he's taking, as I don't have the background or knowledge of the area I'm being dragged into.

Many thanks,

Zd_Nomad


You should knock on your supervisors door and tell him exactly what you have written here.
Alternatively, pick a path of your own, write up that as your proposal going forwards and let them both discuss it with you in the same room. Try not to leave the room until you get agreement on the way forwards between all three of you. After that, you may wish to stop meeting up with them so much and get on with your agreed package of work.

Making a complaint
P

Yes I must admit to thinking the same thing as ToL when I saw your post.
Did you make any attempt to be proactive about this? Did you make enquiries about any deadlines or responsibilities on your own part regarding each module or did you expect them to tell you everything?
If it's the latter then you are on dodgy ground here I think.
If it is the former and you have an email trail or suchlike and all other students had the same problem then you may have a strong case.
Either way be prepared to be asked the reasonable question of how someone at your level allowed themselves to get so close to a submission date without checking up with the course leader. This sort of thing really should be getting checked on the first week of the course.

Leaving out poor grade qualifications when applying for funded PhDs
P

Your old degree is irrelevant now in comparison with your current MSc. I would list the grade but I certainly wouldn't bring undue attention to it. It was well over 20 years ago now anyway.
I went through the same process. A 2:2 when I was younger and then a Masters when I hit my 40s which wiped that old degree out entirely.

Don't know what to do after I finish my PhD...
P

What you need to do is buy yourself some time to think.
I have two suggestions.
You could either consider self employment as another option or you could temporarily take a stressfree menial job to cover your bills for a few months.
Right now it sounds like your current lifestyle is not leaving you able to think clearly at all.
You have a 50 to 60 year active life ahead of you assuming you are in your twenties. You are allowed to stop sprinting from time to time.

checking the citations and references
P

I included the title in my references to help with this.
I wouldn't say I ever learned all 300 plus references inside out as TOL managed but I could look at each title and recall the reason I was referencing it.

Repetitious thesis
P

Quote From Tudor_Queen:
Yes, it needs an overall intro and a discussion (and will have the papers in the middle).

When I say I am copying it in, I mean I copy it in and then change it - it is the same facts just hashed up in a different way (it definitely would not be plagiarism - I am changing things enough for that). I see no other way to justify each study. The intros do differ a lot more as they get down to the final paragraphs and describing the present study and the nitty gritty - but several sections are always the same story - it is the same overarching ideas that make the rationale for the 3 studies. :/


Be careful about repetition in a thesis. A colleague of mine did that and it risks seriously pissing off your examiner as it did in that case.

struggling with my PhD advisor
P

Quote From classictea:
Quote From Tudor_Queen:
So what are your options now would you say?


I have no options, I have to keep struggling and work with my previous advisor. I'll sue the university for this right after I finish the PhD.


My advice would to focus on getting finished. Unless you have a bottomless pit of money and energy to take legal action, you should forget all about that route.
Get done and move on. Life is too short.

Is it appropriate to call graduate school regarding late viva exam?
P

Yes.
It took my university 4 weeks to post my thesis and only did so when I chased them.
I graduated in absentia and they didnt send my certificate until I pestered them for 4 weeks by email.
They lost my address and then apparently lost the bloody certificate and had to reorder it.
I was about to make the trip into the university itself to have it resolved face to face on Monday but received a text from DHL on Friday to say it will be delivered to my home on Monday.

In my experience large companies are absolutely stuffed with employees who are a complete waste of space. Universities are included in that. Never be afraid to chase them or escalate things if they start hiding behind emails.

Supervisor doesn't read PhD thesis
P

Quote From TreeofLife:
Quote From helebon:

I will be asking the Students Union advisor what they mean by the procedure in place and how this is guaranteed, I will post their response.


You're not going to find a procedure. It's a myth that people can't give "bad" references. What you can't do is lie. If I have a bad student, I will write honestly but unenthusiastically about them e.g. "this person is capable of doing this job with a lot of close supervision" "They averaged 62% overall, which is on par with 50% of their cohort". If I want to comment on timeliness I might say, "this person submitted 60% of their work on time; the average of their cohort was 90%." At the end of the reference, I wouldn't specifically recommend them for a position.

It's quite clear that students aren't great when references are written like this. I don't have to explicitly say, "the student needed a lot of attention and was unable to show initiative, they got average grades and they were frequently late" for this meaning to come across anyway.


It is worse than this. A phone call between your referee and your prospective boss won't be recorded and they can say whatever they like. I would always phone a referee and speak to them. Written references are not credible. Anyone relying on them risks hiring a bad employee they may well have trouble getting rid of.

We can have all the protective employment legislation in the world but employers can and routinely do hire on whatever criteria they want.

Make writing fun
P

Nothing beats being genuinely interested in and believing in what you are writing.
I always try to write with the principle of "right first time" in mind. For me, the idea of having to heavily edit a 270 page thesis is a nightmare.
I start with a series of headings and sub headings, progressing until each section requires only a few pages of text. That gives me the overall structure. Anything which requires a structural overhaul would give me sleepless nights. After the first draft, I expect to only then require a few days or a week or two perhaps on minor revisions. Occasionally a 3rd revision of very minor touch of an hour or two is required if something has been missed. All of my published papers required no more than this before submitting to the journal. My thesis required a 3rd draft as described above. My first draft took about 4 months to write 270 odd pages and another 4 weeks of relatively small changes before submitting. For me, that attitude of "right first time" meant everything was relatively pain free (with one exception). Mind you, I genuinely enjoyed writing it. I hated doing the revisions.

One thing I like to do is to imagine I am actually saying the words to a room of students.
I found that helped me to clarify my writing when describing difficult concepts because I could imagine the students asking questions.

Need Guidance on Choosing a PhD Organizational Development/Leadership Program
P

Quote From chaotic1328:


Here in the UK, several universities are being reined in because of it.



PM 133, interesting. Please give more details or supply the links to this. I'd like to find out more about this.


The link below is fairly recent.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-41984465