Overview of pm133

Recent Posts

my supervisor gave my project to another student
P

Quote From Moon1:
Hi tru thanks for your reply
I am good in English I hold a master degree from USA . I have been there 3 years. My supervisor put in my 6 months assessment that I am very good in English. I asked for help from my uni tutoring center to help me improving my writing . I gave them my examiners comments, one of them said why he said you have to write your report in scientific English? You wrote your report in a good english . I did my corrections and I did my second chance of ESA . they also didn't allow me to pass and their comment was you improved but that wasn't enough for the PhD. By the way, my supervisor read my report before submitted it to the examiners in my first ESA and he said great! Good!


Without seeing your report it is impossible for anyone on this forum to cast judgement on your quality of English, either positively or negatively. If you are hearing negative comments from people who have seen your report you would do very well not to ignore it.
As for your treatment, this is simply appalling and absolutely typical of academics who believe they are untouchable. Other than trying to talk to your supervisor and the support staff at your university it is hard to advise you here. Have you essentially failed your first year viva?

Any advice for a new start PhD?
P

Quote From emily_phd_student:
Thanks Chickpea.

I totally agree that I need to give it longer. I am stubborn as hell so I know I wont give up easily and I got on the course so clearly I can't be terrible however I am still freaking out a bit.
I keep avoiding going to the office. I have pulled two sickies this week alone so I don't have to go in. I am supposed to be planning an experiment with a postdoc but I'm avoiding her like the plague for literally no apparent reason. I had a panic attack the other day because I'm pathetic.
I think the further I'm getting into this PhD I am realising that the project isn't what I thought it'd be and I don't particularly want to do it. For example, I had a meeting with my supervisor earlier and throughout the whole thing I was just thinking about how I didn't want to be there.
I think it's clear that I'm not managing the stress etc very well and I'm aware that there is clearly some underlying anxiety issue going on that I need help with but I really am struggling and I am fearful that I've made the wrong choice and keeping going will only make it worse.

This is a much more revealing post.
There is a world of difference between feeling you are useless on a particular phd and actually not wanting to do the phd itself.
My advice in these situations is that if you are absolutely certain this phd position is not for you then you must quit before you allow the work to crush your confidence to the point where it breaks you.
Any further advice is going to be irrelevant until you can answer that question first.
There is a saying that winners never quit. That is nonsense. It is how you end up losiing everything. Winners know when to quit and when to stick. You are already faking sick days so this is indicative of how urgently you need to sort this out.
Good luck with this.

Low ranked university, but fully funded and great supervisor
P

Quote From nastygocart:
Thanks for all the responses! They have been very helpful!

You seem to have an unhealthy obsession with rankings. The university you graduated from is irrelevant. It is also a little odd to see a first year student who feels qualified to make judgemts on the publication record of their supervisor. I am surprised your "awesome grades" didnt attract attention from your alma mater to be honest.


Well... I have not really cared about rankings before, but then I started to read up on it and it got me a bit nervous. I have not studied in the UK before so I don't really know much about the academic "culture" over here.

On a side not, why shouldn't I be qualified to make judgments of my supervisor's publication record? Just because I'm a first year student it doesn't mean I'm unqualitfied to do so. And my "awesome grades" did attract attention, but what I wanted to do didn't really match with that faculty's research focus.


I am taking you at face value here. In one post you have described yourself as a wonderboy with awesome grades. You have then severely criticised your university and cast judgement on your supervisors publication record.
It sounds like you are blowing smoke up your own backside and in the UK we have a delightful habit of teasing people like that. I hope you are not actually voicing these opinions. are you? To your colleagues?

Perhaps when you have finished your phd or have a decent publication record yourself you will be able to answer your own question about why a first year student should not be critiquing their supervisor in this way.

To return to your original point, and the reason I am addressing you in this way, is that your biggest problem here is your attitude. forget your supervisors record, your university ranking, your awesome grades and your wonderboy delusion. NONE of it matters. Get your head down, start publishing and let your work do your talking for you. That is your best chance of a successful phd. That is my advice.

Low ranked university, but fully funded and great supervisor
P

Quote From nastygocart:
Hi,

I'm currently a fully funded first year PhD student at a sucky ranked UK university (in most UK rankings around 80-100). My department is not particularly research oriented and has at the moment not too much cash to throw around. The university has just recently started to try to cut their spendings; staff, resources, travel expenses, conference fees, and so on. However, until now I have felt like a wonderboy that the department has gladly funded to go to conferences, but not anymore. Most of the other PhD students are not good. In some cases they are horrible. I am the only one that is funded.

My supervisor is very ambitious and has a really (!) impressive network. His/her research record is alright, not mind blowing, but OK. She/he is really keen that I produce papers during my time there, go to workshops/conferences, and get opportunities to teach. She also shares the same alternative research interest as me.

But I am starting to think that I may be shooting myself in the foot by doing my PhD at this very low ranked and poor university? Will it fuck up a potential academic career?

I have a bachelors and a two-year master's degree from a university that is ranked top 100 in the world. The faculty is well-known for their research and I have awesome grades.

I have been shortlisted for two PhD positions before. One of them was at a faculty that is specialised in my area of interest, research oriented, and is quite well-known internationally. I didn't get the position but I was ranked 2nd out of twenty applicants. Their PhD positions are always salaried.

I'm starting to doubt the choices I have done and would need some helpful advices. Should I quit? Should I hang in there? Should I wait and try to apply to the faculty that almost took me in before when a positions opens up? Any suggestions?


You seem to have an unhealthy obsession with rankings. The university you graduated from is irrelevant. It is also a little odd to see a first year student who feels qualified to make judgemts on the publication record of their supervisor. I am surprised your "awesome grades" didnt attract attention from your alma mater to be honest.

Can I please ask what you did within the first 6 months of your PhD? What did you achieve? Hours?etc
P

Quote From Maria212:
As a part time student, I would really like to know what you achieved within the first 6 months?

And as a full time student too please...?


I was fortunate enough to have a paper published and to be close to finishing a second.
I was full time though.
I would say that its probably not that relevant to your situation though because our areas of research are probably different. It sounds like you are comparing yourself to others and that is one guarantted route to madness. The more important question is what does your supervisor expect by 6 months?

Self-Funded PhDs. Good or Bad?
P

Quote From fallenonion:
Hi pd1598. Well, my point to the OP is that, personally, I think it depends on circumstance. A blanket view that no funding means don't do it, I think is too sweeping. I have heard of self funded candidates getting jobs, so it has to happen to someone. I was trying to help, sorry if it wasn't clear. I'm assuming that the OP has some form of income, as I,doubt they expected yo live on air for years.

I'm sorry also if you think I'm ranting. My point is, there are (or should be) different routes for everyone. Not everyone peaks at undergrad, and knows at the age of 21 or 22 that academia is what they want to do. Some people, like me, felt it wasn't an option, went off and did other things, then came back to it later. Once you've got a mortgage and stuff, it's difficult to get by on a bursary. But If you've worked, and saved and are prepared to make the sacrifices necessary, why shouldn't that be rewarded? It makes no sense to me.


I am on a fully funded phd in the UK and have a mortgage and three children to feed. My wife earns less than I do and we get by perfectly well. You would be well advised to rethink your attitude. Specifically it isnt helpful to rail against unfairness. The world has never operated on fair principles. It should. But it doesnt. Be careful you dont become consumed with anger about it.
My advice is that you should do whatever feels right. Academia recruits people based on rules probably nobody on here is privy to. Trying to second guess these people is the root of all madness. Industry hires phd graduates. if your skills are transferable, can figure out how to create a decent CV and you can hold a conversation in an interview you should have no problems. Good luck.

First year of PhD. Full time job and part time PhD student!! Please help. Writers block since June!!
P

Quote From Maria212:
I am 27, part time PhD Student and in a full time job. My hours are a little crazy. According to the code of practice I need to invest 12 hours a week as the base minimum into my PhD. So far I have been doing two hours each day religiously after work from 6pm – 8pm and do 8 hours on a Saturday and 8 hours on a Sunday which totals to 26 hours a week part time on my PhD.
I tend to work better in short bursts as I don’t lose momentum. I am panicking because I haven’t done much since June and I am already 6 months into the PhD..!! My annual review is in April 2017 and I am just panicking because I don’t think I have made much progress! I am exhausted, tired, have pretty much no social life and working my guts out. I worry constantly that I am not working hard enough. Any advice?
What did you guys complete in the first 6 months of your PhD?? Please help!


I am not surprised you are having some difficulty. It sounds like you have burnt yourself out. If my arithmetic is correct you are putting in at least 65 to 70 hours per week. That is an absolutely insane number of hours to be working per week doing technically difficult work. It is absolutely impossible to be fully productive if you are doing those hours.

Anyone with two PhDs?
P

Quote From jojo:
i can understand the theology one, but why not do an MA? or a postdoc? i just never understand people who do two masters, two bscs etc. but soon i'll be joining the two masters club after my phd. probably take a masters in a completely different field.... for the fun of learning more about the field without the pressure of a thesis.


Doing two full degrees at Masters or Honours level is quite common. I have done it.
I made a career out of the first degree which lasted around 15 years and then I got bored and went back for a second stab at a new career which required a degree. I am as certain as I can be that this will not be my last degree.
It most certainly will be my last PhD though.

PhD at older age?
P

Quote From RKV:
Dear Friends,
For doing a PhD (Aero) in the US, I got positive response from a few universities. I am 32 now (Single). I am planning to get married in between PhD.

Is it possible to work a Full time PhD with part time job (in industry)?. I have 5 years R& D work experience. I think Its possible. For that, I have to convince my supervisor as well as the University.

As a single, there no financial difficulties (Univ. PhD stipend is more than sufficient), but once married, I have to earn money for survival along with spouse.

Any Advice and suggestions will be greatly respected.


Not sure why getting married would suddenly require you to earn more money unless your spouse is planning not to work at all.

Viva prep: how many hours!?
P

Quote From GrumpyMule:
Hello all,

I've read lots of very useful advice RE viva prep. In particular a lovely person on this forum recommended Murray's chapter in How to write a thesis and a first read of that has proved very reassuring.

I now have 4 weeks and 4 days until my viva. I haven't looked at the thesis since submission but feel the pressing need to start preparing.

My question is... how many hours do people spend/have people spent preparing for the viva? Murray's book talks about starting to prepare one month before but I also need to consider that I work 35 hours a week.

I am planning to begin spending an hour a day every day on viva prep and possibly a little more in the week before. I'm finding it really hard to know how much preparation to do (eg. how well should I know every paper cited and how much wider literature should I read). Some of these things are hard to measure in hours.

Any advice is much appreciated.

Thanks

GM


Personally I have been consciously preparing for my viva for the entire duration of my PhD. I have never been a believer in crash studying as an effective thing to do. I may well be prepared to change my opinion if I end up getting hosed when I finally sit it though.

PhD at older age?
P

Quote From Tudor_Queen:
I'm not sure what others think about this, but I can't really liken the supervisor-student relationship to a manager/boss-employee one. For me, it has been completely different. I'd say it is more like a marriage, or very longterm relationship (but no, more like a marriage - because your funding is involved, etc so no way do you want a divorce!). Your PhD is like the baby. If you're getting on, great. If not, then there is a very different kind of stress/feeling until you can work it out with them. You don't leave your PhD in the office (even if you technically do) - it's more than a job.

But it's something you navigate once you get to know them. It would be hard to know beforehand if there were going to be issues. If you're determined to do a PhD and enjoy the process, you'll make a way for it to work out if things do get tricky on the supervisor front.

My supervisors are also great!


I would agree that the supervisor/student thing bears no relation to a manager/worker situation. TBH I would be extremely concerned if anyone cnosidered their supervisor to be their boss because this is supposed to be the student's PhD not the supervisor's.

As for the age thing. It isnt even a consideration. There is no age barrier. 47 years old and currently writing up.

PhD at older age?
P

Quote From Mattfabb:
To be completely honest, I found that some older PhD students struggle a bit with the whole supervision thing. Being a PhD means that, to put it bluntly, you are in a subordinate position to your super. Some scholars I know who already published books and stuff, find it difficult to go back being supervised. Also: a friend of mine in his 50s is so stubborn that he ended up fighting with his supers and even with his examiners at the viva. He doesent seem to be handling it well at all...


This really has nothing to do with his age and everything to do with his attitude.

Lazy PhD advisor destroyed my experience of doing research and PhD
P

Also I am confused about your attitude here.
Lazy supervisor?

Lazy PhD advisor destroyed my experience of doing research and PhD
P

Too old to start a PhD at 31 ?????
Why on earth would you think that?

Playing 2nd Fiddle to the PhD
P

I would echo the advice above. You really need to be saying all this stuff to your partner.