Signup date: 04 Dec 2006 at 9:01pm
Last login: 12 Jun 2009 at 6:38pm
Post count: 321
Hello again,
I've just been told that it's grammatically correct to put everything in past tense BUT it's ok to write about more recent stuff in the present (i.e. stuff a few years old).
I'm assuming however that studies (i.e. where people do stuff with other people/experiments), should always be written in the past tense as these are 'facts'.
Hi All,
Thanks for your responses. I discuss my own findings in past tense, so am really trying to work out what tense to use when discussing other peoples work.
Argh - it's confusing.
My supervisor has said strictly speaking everything should be past tense, but sometimes it reads better if things are present (i.e. work done within the last 5 years or so).
Any other opinions on this would be greatly appreciated.
Hello Everyone,
I'm currently making amendments to my chapters, and am very confused about whether things should be in the present or past tense (i.e. he asserts 'apples are good' OR he asserted 'apples are good').
The thing is, on the chapter I'm currently working on, my supervisor has said by a couple of paragraphs that I should put what I'm saying in past tense (because the studies were written a long time ago), but not done this by other paragraphs/work (which were also written a long time ago).
Is there a rule about tenses??? Is it grammatically wrong to put everything in past tense, or would you just put what your supervisor has commented on in past tense???
I've flicked through some books and noticed that people seem to chop and change sporadically!
Argh!!!
I agree with Badhaircut ...
80K is plenty for a soc sci PhD (I've known people who have only written 60K and passed).
Less words = less waffle (and less for the examiners to criticise in the viva)!!!
Also ... your supervisor is telling you to edit/chop bits out for a reason - listen to them!
Good luck.
Listen to your family ... complete your MSc first and then think about what you would like to do next (you wouldn't be planning on doing a PhD until 2008 so you have time to mull over this).
If the PhD isn't appropriate to your future career development, then you should give it serious consideration about whether it is worth doing (i.e. for the meantime would it be more beneficial for you to do a professional course and secure a job that you want to do - then, in future years, you could do a PhD (part-time) for personal 'pleasure'). Yes, a PhD is primarily for careers in academia but some industries also look for people who have these. Personally, I would go with your 'gut instinct' - complete the Masters, do a professional course, get a job, then maybe do a PhD part-time in future years (based on the fact that you definitely do not want a career in academia).
Keep us updated.
PostgraduateForum Is a trading name of FindAUniversity Ltd
FindAUniversity Ltd, 77 Sidney St, Sheffield, S1 4RG, UK. Tel +44 (0) 114 268 4940 Fax: +44 (0) 114 268 5766
An active and supportive community.
Support and advice from your peers.
Your postgraduate questions answered.
Use your experience to help others.
Enter your email address below to get started with your forum account
Enter your username below to login to your account
An email has been sent to your email account along with instructions on how to reset your password. If you do not recieve your email, or have any futher problems accessing your account, then please contact our customer support.
or continue as guest
To ensure all features on our website work properly, your computer, tablet or mobile needs to accept cookies. Our cookies don’t store your personal information, but provide us with anonymous information about use of the website and help us recognise you so we can offer you services more relevant to you. For more information please read our privacy policy
Agree Agree