Overview of Jamie_Wizard

Recent Posts

Paper request
J

I know it's a bit of a longshot, but I'm after "Fly Fishing", it's by J. R. Hartley.

fallen down a funding crack due to Covid
J

Sorry to hear about your ordeal. Rewt's advice is good, but more specifically you could ask them to explicitly say that you "received funding starting on date x, which ceased on date y", that way it is clearly stating you have no source of income or loan, which may have more effect in terms of convincing them you need the financial support. Good luck.

Strategy for picking reviewers for a manuscript
J

Hi rewt,

Yes, my previous Ph.D. supervisor also used to do that for papers we worked on.

I found, this, which essentially recommends the same, and a few other points:

https://imechanica.org/node/14942

Wizard

Strategy for picking reviewers for a manuscript
J

Happy New Year everyone!

I am to submit another manuscript shortly and felt it would be good to get ideas on what is a good strategy when picking reviewers to put forward for submission of a paper.

I have experienced that reviewers can expedite or hamper the submission process. More often than not, submission can be impeded by reviewers who haven't properly read the paper, don't have the relevant knowledge (though they should according to their profile), or are just difficult for the sake of it hence I think it would be a good thread for myself and others.

Would be good to hear your thoughts and experiences.

Cheers

Am i a failure?
J

Sorry to hear you feel that way. Another person might view the Clinical Research Assistant role a good position, whilst you potentially view it as a failure, so I think despite having challenges in the pursuit of a PhD, there is some faulty thinking at play here (we all have this to a degree).

I think the following book will help you. Particularly, the section on External vs Internal centred values.

https://web.csulb.edu/~tstevens/

or PDF version:
https://web.csulb.edu/~tstevens/ChooseToBeHappy.pdf

Wishing you all the best,
Jamie

Brexit and PhD studentships
J

Quote From Mackem_Beefy:
There is one for the Ph.D. itself.

http://www.geocities.ws/high_temp_wear/phdgame.jpg

Ian


Thanks Ian. This was probably the first document I got my hands on when I started my PhD :-p

Thanks to all for the postdoc interview suggestions
J

Good luck! Fingers crossed.

Brexit and PhD studentships
J

Quote From rewt:
Wouldn't that be drink every time your supervisor changes the project or you get rejected for a grant?


haha yes. that sounds about right rewt.

Brexit and PhD studentships
J

Is there one for the post-doc game?

PhD help
J

If you are really set on getting a PhD, you could first do an M.Res (Masters by research). That way you'll have 1 (sometimes 2) research projects to demonstrate your research abilities. Do these well and you shouldn't have trouble applying after you've completed it.

Should I publish a article before a Phd?
J

Rewt is right, it can be a lot of work --- the peer view process can also take time. I would suggest submitting a poster representing your work to a good conference, but with COVID there's lots of disruption, some may still go ahead online.

LOR Alignment issue
J

:-P

LOR Alignment issue
J

I'm surprised nobody got my joke "isn't even justified", or perhaps it wasn't that funny, lol.

Can a new post doc, who didn't contribute to the work, presents a PhD student work?
J

You say the experiments were done by your co-authors and analysed by you so you shouldn't be possessive of the results, as you have not produced them, but helped in producing them by your analysis. On the other hand, you have done significant work analysing the results. One has to be mindful that you are working in a team environment. That said, it would not be fair for the post-doc to take all the credit.

When I did my PhD, my supervisor set the research question and I went away and did all the work. When it came to publishing, we published as joint authors, with my supervisor being the corresponding author. The papers listed the contribution of each of us. Your PI should ensure you get placed appropriately in the author list. With conferences it is a bit more tricky. When I presented my work, I put "under the supervision of", to acknowledge my supervisor. When my supervisor presented my/our work, he put his name on top of the slides, but made it clear on the next slide that the results were the outcome of the was doing the work and listed my name. Experienced PIs usually give a short summary at the end of slides and often briefly mention verbally who is doing what in the lab.

Part of the post-docs responsibility is to also present the labs work, and of course, you have a part in that because you're a PhD student (i.e. learning through doing/presenting) and have done a significant part of the work.

I would discuss it with your PI, ask about what the convention is in recognising your work. Be professional in your interaction.

Good luck.

Major corrections as R&R
J

I'm sorry to hear of your viva outcome. In my opinion, just do the corrections and you'll have no reason not to be awarded your PhD. I wouldn't get enticed by going for "procedural irregularities" even if you allege they have behaved unprofessionally, besides it could take years for this process with no guarantee that you could prove this is why you've got R&R. Your PhD is to be awarded on your work, and now you have an opportunity to improve it. Just focus on that and you will be finished quicker.

If your university only has minor amendments or R&R as viva outcomes, then it just means you have some corrections to do. Don't try to catastrophise or imagine how the examiners will judge your changes negatively. Instead, make sure your corrections are good and thorough enough that they can't reject them.

Good luck.