Signup date: 06 Apr 2009 at 7:49pm
Last login: 02 Jul 2010 at 12:57pm
Post count: 36
Hi Stuarte,
Good to hear that I'm not the only "mature" PhD student, - although, have to say, you've got an extra decade or so of experience than I have. I'm starting full-time in October with full AHRC funding, and having survived that insanely competitive process, aided and abetted by 3 kids, I'm determined to see this through in less than 4 years. I've found that returning to study at this stage is much more efficient than last time around: no time wasted on checking everybody else out. Well, not much time ;)
You sound well placed to make a strong start on yours, and wishing you the very best.
======= Date Modified 15 Jul 2010 16:45:38 =======
======= Date Modified 15 Jul 2010 16:38:25 =======
Bit of a sore topic for me:
The threshold for an MA Distinction at Uni was 80%, rather than the customary 70%.
Yours truly wound up with an overall of 79.08%, ie. less than half of 1% away from an overall Distinction.
Gutted.
======= Date Modified 15 Jul 2010 16:33:00 =======
Hi
I missed the Jan 2010 deadlines, when my OH broke his leg with serious complications. Was pretty gutted, and resigned myself to waiting another year. Then out of the blue, a funded collaborative award cropped up, in June, and I've just heard today that I'm the successful candidate So if you have the time/energy to invest in continuing your funding quest, then go for it.
Thanks for your well-considered replies.
My first instinct is to delve a little deeper into the reputation of the potential supervisors.
Having said that, though, it's not my intention to follow a long-term academic career: the purpose of my gaining a PhD is to fast-track access to the higher professional roles in my specialist area. And here's the rub: if I'm not aiming to live in academia, perhaps the association with a high status collaborative partner (albeit in conjunction with a weak institution) will be more significant to my future career than being supervised by an academic at a top-notch university.
Whilst I can afford to self-fund, ideally, I would've met the funding deadlines, for a 2010 start. This didn't happen, owing to an injury, and I'm reluctant to delay for a further year.
So what I'm trying to evaluate isn't the risk of self-funding vs funded, but rather the intrinsic value of the completed PhD, according to the two options outlined in the original post.
Initially, I assumed the world-class institution/unfunded route was better. However, I've recently begun to wonder if the world-class collaborative partner for the funded, 2nd-rate institution, would provide sufficient status to compensate for its academic shortcomings.
Any thoughts?
Magictime - Like you, I have kids and a lack of geographic flexibility to factor in. Like you, solid grades, - but my final 79.4% fell short of the Distinction threshold of 80%. Logic says I should submit a radically revised proposal, in collaboration with the department. But I'm reluctant to let go of my thesis, given how it was received at the time, and its role as the pilot study for my proposal. It's frustrating to be in this situation, given the claimed support for interdisciplinarity, and the prominent role of cross-cutting strategic themes in the AHRC's 'Future Directions.' I expected to meet some resistance, as my approach involves the experimental manipulation of variables, to demonstrate behavioural issues amongst consumers of arts/culture. It's incongruous to have on one side, arts funding bodies insisting upon fiscal accountability/broader audiences, whilst the research opportunities seem to be limited to the perpetuation of introspective practices, rather than engaging with issues that affect the cultural sector here and now. Publishing is appealing, but I'd rather push on. But I can't imagine devoting 6 years to a part-time PhD if I didn't feel passionate about its framework. Thanks for your comments.
Thanks Pamplemousse (in a quiet whisper, whilst trying not to hijack thread):
Just a bit gutted having got a Distinction for my MA thesis, which was recommended for publication, and rated as unprecedented by my tutors. Ah well.
What I'm struggle to understand is the irreconcilable contradiction between the notion of innovation as valued by AHRC, and the necessity for the res prop to fit within the well-established research strengths of academic depts.
Too big a problem for my little brain, I suppose.
Well done Magictime.
I've just heard today that my the uni won't accept my application because my (Arts/Humanities) res prop doesn't match existing research strengths at the Uni.
I've been invited to "shape my research interests in such a way that they could be adequately supervised within the school."
What are the options here?
- Resubmit a completely rewritten res prop?
- Attempt to proceed without AHRC funding?
- Give up?
-Some/all of the above?
PostgraduateForum Is a trading name of FindAUniversity Ltd
FindAUniversity Ltd, 77 Sidney St, Sheffield, S1 4RG, UK. Tel +44 (0) 114 268 4940 Fax: +44 (0) 114 268 5766
An active and supportive community.
Support and advice from your peers.
Your postgraduate questions answered.
Use your experience to help others.
Enter your email address below to get started with your forum account
Enter your username below to login to your account
An email has been sent to your email account along with instructions on how to reset your password. If you do not recieve your email, or have any futher problems accessing your account, then please contact our customer support.
or continue as guest
To ensure all features on our website work properly, your computer, tablet or mobile needs to accept cookies. Our cookies don’t store your personal information, but provide us with anonymous information about use of the website and help us recognise you so we can offer you services more relevant to you. For more information please read our privacy policy
Agree Agree